Competitive tendering versus performance-based negotiation in Swiss public transport
نویسندگان
چکیده
The purpose of this study is to assess di¤erences in the levels of cost e¢ ciency of bus lines operated under competitively tendered contracts and performance-based negotiated contracts. Following the revision of the Swiss railways act in 1996, regional public authorities were given the choice between two di¤erent contractual regimes to procure public passenger transport services. We directly compare the impact of competitive tendering and performance-based negotiation by applying a stochastic frontier analysis to the complete dataset of bus lines (n=630) operated by the main Swiss company (Swiss Post) at the same time (in 2009) throughout the country. The overall results show that the di¤erences in the levels of cost e¢ ciency between the two contractual regimes are not signi cant. Our ndings are in line with recent evidence of cost convergence between competitive tendering and performance-based negotiation, and suggest that the practice of using both contractual regimes is challenging for the operators in terms of competitive pressure. The threat of competitive tendering may have a disciplining e¤ect on negotiation since it prevents bus companies from bargaining inadequate rents and inducing asymmetric information advantages. Keywords: public bus contracts, competitive tendering, performancebased negotiation, cost e¢ ciency. JEL classi cation: C21, D24, H57, L92. Institute of Economics (IdEP), Università della Svizzera italiana (USI); Department of Management, Technology and Economics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland. yDepartment of Management, Technology and Economics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland. zDepartment of Management, Information and Production Engineering (DIGIP), University of Bergamo, Italy; Institute of Economics (IdEP), Università della Svizzera italiana (USI), Switzerland. Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected].
منابع مشابه
To competitively tender or to negotiate e Weighing up the choices in a mature market
A key attribute of competitive tendering for the periodic selection of operators of subsidised public transport services is to secure the provision of specified services at efficient cost levels. This has proved particularly effective where services were previously provided by an inefficient monopoly operator. The arguments for the adoption of competitive tendering in preference to negotiation ...
متن کاملCustomer service quality and benchmarking in public transport contracts
As contracting of public transport services increases in sophistication, there is a growing focus on an increasing number of key performance indicators that emphasis service quality. Although contracts won under competitive tendering or by negotiation are assessed on a number of evaluation criteria, cost efficiency still remains the main basis for selecting a preferred operator. There has been ...
متن کاملTradeoff Negotiation: The Importance of Getting in the Game; Comment on “Swiss-CHAT: Citizens Discuss Priorities for Swiss Health Insurance Coverage”
Swiss-CHAT’s playful approach to public rationing can be considered in terms of deliberative process design as well as in terms of health policy. The process’ forced negotiation of trade-offs exposed unexamined driving questions, and challenged prevalent presumptions about health care demand and about conditions of public reasoning that enable transparent rationing. While the experiment provide...
متن کاملTransacting under a Performance-Based Contract: The Role of Negotiation and Competitive Tendering
There is a growing body of theoretical and empirical evidence to support the promotion of awarding mechanisms with formal and informal devices, aimed at economic efficiency and effectiveness through the life of the contract i.e., ex ante and ex post coordination. Building on growing arguments to support negotiations instead of auctions, Bajari et al. (2002) suggest that auctions perform poorly ...
متن کاملEuropean Ways to Organise Public Transport
The European public transport scene was revolutionised by the British deregulation of 1986 but the more cautious bus reform by route tendering introduced in London in 1984 appeared to be a more convincing example for many countries. Copenhagen, e.g., introduced a similar regime and route-by-route competitive tendering has now become the norm in almost the whole of both Denmark and Sweden and ca...
متن کامل